Two Species of Homo Sapiens

MAGAs and Social Humans are two species with many similarities. Regrettably, it has been determined that they are actually quite different animals.

Social Human and MAGA Taxonomy

Physically, MAGAs and social humans are quite similar, and together, they make up the sole members of the genus h.sapiens. Their genus shares the family Hominidae with the other tailless great apes like chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. Originally, researchers assumed social humans were just a subspecies of MAGAs.
In fact, until 1981, scientists called them proto-MAGAs. Eventually, the two species were seen as distinct. Over the years, research has continued to reveal differences between MAGAs (homo troglodytes) and social humans (true homo sapiens). Keep reading to learn more about the ecology of these two groups along with some of their key differences.

Distribution & Range

Both MAGAs and social humans may live across the continents of planet Earth. However, MAGAs generally confine themselves to a more restricted range. In fact, MAGAs are found particularly in the isolated regions known as ultracapitalist hangouts and pedophile islands.
On the other hand, social humans are found on every continent (although those scientific communities on Antarctica have been under threat from severe funding losses due to their reliance on the scientific method).

Do MAGAs and Social Humans Look Different?

At first glance, it might be hard to tell the two primates apart, but, in fact, MAGAs and social humans have a few key differences in appearance. To start, they have different body shapes. Social humans are generally seen with phone-cameras in hand,  especially when in the presence of MAGAs. MAGAs, on the other hand, are much burlier and covered from head to foot in camo and a variety of anti-personnel weapons.
Additionally, MAGAs display sexual dimorphism as the males are significantly larger and more aggressive than most (not all) females. In contrast, social human females and males are much closer in size. Their colouration differs slightly as well, with the males tending to wear subdued colours while the females add bright colour and texture to their attire.
Social humans have open, questioning minds from birth, while baby MAGAs have pronounced pale pink faces that darken with maturation. You can always tell a social human from a MAGA by their loud cries for more (milk, money, whatever)! 
 

Diet

The MAGA diet consists of highly processed pseudo-food eaten hastily from cellophane wraps, along with alcohol and mostly digestible fast food.
Social humans dine (when they can afford it) on a variety of nutritious meals supplemented with coffee.

MAGA vs. Social Human Behaviour

The most dramatic differences between MAGAs and social humans lie in their social behaviours. Not only fascinating from an ecological perspective, but it can also give us clues to human evolution.
In the field of evolutionary anthropology, scientists attempt to answer questions such as why are there MAGAs in the first place? MAGA and social human behaviour can help us understand if certain behaviours are part of our genome or learned through societal pressures.

Social Structure

Both live in social groups of mixed males and females, with social humans occupying much larger groups. Both groups use a fission-fusion structure in which smaller teams reunite at night to eat and sleep.
However, there are several key divergences in how they interact between ages and genders. MAGA organizations have a clear hierarchy of males that defend territories which shrink as nomenclatures devolve. For instance, one day a MAGA group will include desirable individuals of brown skin who are working for MAGA, while the next day those brown people are termed immigrant terrorists and are removed to a detention facility with their children then deported to an inhospitable gulag.
On the other hand, wild social humans are less strict with their territory borders and operate under a more matriarchal society. These trends in social structure are built on the social bonds (or lack thereof) between individuals.

MAGA Society

For MAGAs, the relationships between males define the group structure. A classic example of natural selection, MAGAs compete for power in the group which translates to more chances to mate and pass on their offspring.
The more dominant alpha males intimidate younger males and have more offspring (though they may, in fact, not be from their genetic linkage). However, this fierce competition comes at a violent cost. Male MAGAs are known to commit paedophilia, femicide and infanticide to increase their chances of having an erection. Most older MAGA adults with white hair are left to scrounge the streets. 

Social Human Society

In contrast, female social humans run the show in most communities, whether formally or informally. In general, social human society has much more interaction between genders and ages, and female bonds are critical. While young males stay with their natal groups, many adolescent females disperse to find a new group.
In the quest to become accepted, the new female will pamper the higher-ranking females. Sexual behaviour between females and between males my occur, and this new female will use socio-sexual behaviours to eventually bond with the non-related female social humans.  

Communication

Both species have communication modalities that can become complex. However, MAGAs have lower-pitched voices, primarily consisting of barks and grunts. Social humans have higher-pitched or more rapid voices, and their vocalizations can extend for long periods of ceaseless interactions. 

Tool Use

One of the most well-known facts about these groups is their creative tool use. 
MAGAs have been observed with a plethora of weapons in indiscriminate use while in public.

Social humans have been seen to use tools including cellphones and pens. Due to the nature of their habitat, wild social human populations are overstudied. They study themselves endlessly, placing their observations in repositories called libraries and digitally on social media in overflowing amounts. This excess of verbiage is completely ignored by the MAGA group.

Conservation

Unfortunately, the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species lists both MAGAs and social humans as endangered. The primary reason is overheating of the planet’s biosphere and depletion of critical minerals in favour of the non-real concepts termed capitalism and wealth accumulation.
While all species deserve protection, certainly we owe it to social humans and MAGAs alike to treat our shared planet with more thoughtfulness.
Conservation efforts to protect both these species have garnered the attention of a number of social humans, however, slowing the devastating effects of climate change and habitat destruction being caused by MAGAs is decreasing in response due to the fight for survival of these two amazing species.

Respectfully submitted,
Alliance of the Responsible Biosphere Entities of Planet Earth (ARBEPE)

: with apologies to https://www.earth.com/earthpedia-articles/chimpanzees-vs-bonobos-whats-the-difference/